https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67826
--- Comment #11 from Pete F <pete.public.em...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Erik Moeller from comment #9) > even if you are still unhappy with the result. Erik, my level of satisfaction is irrelevant. As I expressed in the Commons RfC, "I Don't Like It"-style votes are not valuable, and should not be counted in evaluating consensus. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_comment/Media_Viewer_software_feature&diff=128325247&oldid=128324966 It seems that you and the Multimedia Team, though, don't take the same view on the other side. You seem to attach great importance to the fact that you reached out to some Wikipedians, and they responded "I Like It." The "NOTCONSENT" policy cited makes it clear that WMF must act on its own discretion on legal matters, and I have no quarrel with that. Certainly there are cases where consensus has no place. But this is not one of them. On matters that involve sophisticated judgment -- is it your position that WMF is capable of evaluating what constitutes good judgment, and local communities are not? It seems that you are quick to cite your community engagement practices when doing so serves your objective of deploying the software, but quick to dismiss community input that do not support that objective. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
