https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67117
--- Comment #4 from Brad Jorsch <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Aaron Schulz from comment #3) > * It's not a huge deal, but it would be nice to use the API (which also > works with things like OAuth if we wanted hubs with more access). Brad might > have an opinion on special page vs API. I don't feel strongly, but we should > get it right given the Link header and cache interaction. OAuth works with special pages too. It sounds like the general idea of the extension is possible to be configured for general users to use? Then an API endpoint wouldn't necessarily be out of place. On the other hand, is there anything wrong with the existing special page implementation? If not, is there a reason not to just stay with that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
