https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68145
--- Comment #3 from Gilles Dubuc <[email protected]> --- > Are you just giving this for granted, or is the consideration specifically > based on tests and/or the algorithm they follow? (I didn't inspect either.) Any jpeg recompression is lossy, theirs included. Depending on the quality settings, you can get away with a few extra passes without necessarily causing a visual difference that people will notice, but if there's a straightforward way to avoid an extra pass, we should do it. I don't see the point of having an initial imagemagick conversion to jpg if it's going to be immediately followed by a mozjpeg pass, they both achieve the same goal. Ideally someone will hook up mozjpeg into imagemagick directly and it'll be one imagemagick option away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
