https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68304

--- Comment #9 from Joachim Mos <[email protected]> ---
I wait one day, if you than want not to help us, I look, who is willing helping
us, what here is written, what can be do, to have no errors, in nothing, what
is helpfull. It is a problem of the server and the software, running there, not
a problem in our wiktionary. 

And, on the one side, I will not delete translations in a wiktionary, so that
there is no error-massage, that is like to say, okay, a wheel on your car is
not okay, put it away and use only three wheels, its enough, on the other side,
we need in future more moduls, because we must handle over 30 dialects, the
system is at time not ready: If it is possible to make changes in our moduls,
so that they need less time, in future, it will not help, because we need for
every articel more moduls, to handle all our dialects. We have somethink like a
multi-lingual wiktionary, some dialects are so different, that a speaker of one
dialect couldn't understand a speaker of an other dialekt. So, in future we
need a function like wiki-media, so that every user can choose his dialect for
the output. The moduls, that have to be written for this function need time on
the server: All what you have said, what can be do, will in the best case only
bring the problem with the runtimeouterror in the near future. Low Saxon
wiktionary is not normal, because we are not one language, we are many
dialects! That's the probleme, we have to handle; it's like the situation, that
all EU-Memberstaats have the idea, insteed of fr.wiktionary, de.wiktionary,
en.wiktionary, ch.wiktionary and so on to have only one, a common wiktionary,
the eu.wiktionary with eu for European Union. We have many moduls and templates
copy from en.wiktionary, but we must modify them to a multi-lingual system. So,
for example, could the en.wiktionary in a translation line write: "Achterhooks:
{{Ö|act|water}}" we need "{{S|act}}: {{Ö|act|water}}", because in future, the
output could be "Achterhooks: water" or "Achterhooksch: water" or
"Achterhooksk: water" and so on, Düütsch, Deitsch, Duitsk, Duutsk and so on is
an other example. In the moment, we have only one Data-Modul, Modul:languages,
where the names of the languages are, in future, we need 30 data moduls or one,
that is something about 20 times so big, impossible, I'know, and loops, to
handle this data-moduls. 

If there wouldn't make changes on the server, we will have every time trouble
with timeouterrors in future, that is so sure as it gives a planet earth.

At last: I'm not good in programming moduls (Lua), but I can programming in
some mashine-languages like C, Basic, Fortran ... My first Computer I had have
in 1981! I know not all but many thinks about Server and so on, and you can
belief in it, if I say, it's a server-problem, than it is a server-problem, and
the only thing, what is possible, is, to make changes by the server. In our
wiktionary we can do nothing against the error, we only can do things, that a
wiktionary-user cannot see, that there is a server-problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to