https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23593
--- Comment #8 from FT2 <[email protected]> 2010-05-24 07:50:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Does revdelete use "date"->"revision" links somewhere else? > > Other that sp:undelete, where the user is already explicitly viewing deleted > content. > > Currently, the idea is that user has to clearly use show/hide (links/buttons) > to request deleted content now. > > If the the date is made into a link, the next obvious question would be "how > do > you see the edit comment as quickly?". It would be useful to resolve that at > the same time. Non-admin users see the redacted entries only, so that's not a concern. The difference for admins is that the date is innocuous. A clickable date says "there was material here that got deleted, click here to view it" but doesn't expose the offensive or disruptive material on their screen if they don't want to see it. But the main reason an edit comment gets revdeleted is if it is grossly offensive or disruptive, perhaps even including virus links in some cases. So that should continue to be as it is now ("comment removed" greyed out). If the admin wants to see the edit comment, they can click on the revision link as normal, and with one click it's shown with the revision. Not initially exposing the revdeleted username and edit comment is sensible. The link to the revision via the date field is both harmless and useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
