https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68320
--- Comment #7 from Brion Vibber <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #6) > I suppose tho goal was to save storage space when the thumbnail and the > original would be exactly the same. It makes the URL-as-API behavior of the > 404 thumbnail handler very unpredictable, though. > > I think the nice behavior would be to return a 301 to the original image in > such cases; that is cached in varnish and on the client so the performance > hit would be minimal. I like it... but maybe use a 302 (moved temporary) as the image may change from one that's not EXIF-rotated to one that is or vice-versa. Eeek... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
