https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68706
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |design CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] | |om Summary|Flow: Reply • Thank quite |Flow: Reply • Thank buttons |buttons only |should be quiet only --- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- I think using core's mw-ui- CSS styles instead of independent flow-ui- styles has introduced unwanted changes to Reply button appearance. Compare en-wiki's "flow-ui-progressive flow-ui-quiet" (good) with mw.org's "mw-ui-button mw-ui-progressive mw-ui-quiet flow-ui-inline" (bold, indented, and spaced too far apart). Flow's version of Agora buttons let us apply x-ui-progressive and x-ui-quiet alone, without x-ui-button making the text bold and surrounded by unwanted button padding. But on mw.org if I remove the mw-ui-button stying then the Reply • Edit • Thank buttons don't have the right hover behavior: they're blue all the time and get an underline on hover. (In reply to May from comment #0) > On hover, reply should be grey instead of blue. Why? The Living style guide says "Use progressive buttons for actions which lead to a next step in the process" which seems to apply to Reply. What's special about Reply that we want to de-emphasize it even on hover? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
