https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57084

Nathan Larson <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #8 from Nathan Larson <[email protected]> ---
Shall we add another field to the logging table? Here are some possibilities:

*log_from_page
*log_source_page
*log_old_page

*log_to_page
*log_destination_page
*log_target_page
*log_new_page

I was thinking we'd want to avoid a name like log_moved_from because we might
want to also use that field for, e.g., merging histories or some other
unforeseen use, besides page moves, in which there's both a "from" page and a
"to" page.

log_new_page has the disadvantage that we might not always be creating a new
page, so it would be misleading.

"source" could have the disadvantage of being confused with rc_source. "old"
could have the disadvantage of being confused with the fields in the text table
that start with old_; plus it suggests that the page_id perhaps has been
supplanted with a new page_id, which is misleading.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to