https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68933
--- Comment #3 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> --- (In reply to MZMcBride from comment #2) > From 57891 comment 56: This should be "From bug 57891 comment 56:". Bugzilla is hard. :-( From bug 57891 comment 57: (In reply to MZMcBride from bug 57891 comment #56) >> Lines importing from the user's global.js or global.css on other wikis can >> simply be commented by a bot, with an edit summary linking the announcement >> of >> the new feature. > > Commenting out is a good point. We'd discussed blanking or deleting, but not > that. If we're doing bot edits, you're probably right that commenting out is > best. Though I'm still not sure we should be doing bot edits and there were > general concerns about leaving behind clutter (e.g., leaving user subpages > around indefinitely that contain only commented-out code). What if it was commented out, a note left on the user's primary wiki talk page, and then if nothing happens, delete the commented out code after some arbitrary number of months like six? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
