https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69539
--- Comment #2 from Tisza Gergő <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Lupo from comment #1) > - Less HTML to paste? (Which in turn helps keep the text wherever the user > is inserting this more easily understandable.) In your example this brings down the embed HTML length from 1027 to 873 characters; I don't think that makes much of a difference. > - Less HTML code where something could wrong when the user pastes it? A percent-encoded fragment in an URL in a href property does not seem like particularly risky to me. > - Nicer, shorter backlinks? The one location where that is exposed to the user is the status bar of the browser where the URL is displayed when hovering over the link. Modern browsers typically truncate that to ~70 characters. For Commons, that leaves about 40 characters for the file name; there is a tendency to use long and descriptive file names (the one in your example is 60 characters), so again, it wouldn't make much difference. > - No pointless duplication of the filename? It's not pointless; it opens MediaViewer, so that the image is displayed in a nicer format than the file page's default layout. That said, the duplication could be avoided by doing something like https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/multimedia/cards/416 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
