https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #30 from Pete F <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Florian from comment #29) > This issue, if i read and remember correctly, isn't a real legal issue, it > relies on how to interpret the CC correct. I don't understand what you're saying -- if the way to interpret a legally binding contract correctly isn't a "real legal issue," then what is? > And if i read correct, in this > bug report Jon pointed out, that it would be great, if the name of the image > uploader is visible in mobile MMV :) I think it is a legal requirement -- and even if I'm wrong, it's certainly a core Wikimedia value -- to clearly communicate who the copyright holder (often not the uploader) is. The current version simply puts a bunch of confusing, jargony gibberish below the photo, like: CC-BY-SA-2.0 [Details] What is a reader supposed to make of that? What do they learn from it? Has ANYTHING meaningful been communicated? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
