https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69447
--- Comment #22 from George Orwell III <[email protected]> --- Forgive my "newbie-ness" here, I know 'soap-box' like speeches are frowned up here, but if... https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/156009 ... is indeed the reversion of the change(s) that caused the problem reported in this bug in the first place, what else is there to actually "solve" here? Maybe I reached this conclusion because I'm in the same boat as the comments made back in #c15 - I can't keep the needed/wanted regressions separate from the pseudo-patches and/or semi-enhancements that all seem to be lumped together for no discernable good reason now. Granted, my participation here is rather recent but I assure you I've been lurking here for some time now and my observation has always been that there are too many conflicting interests at play all at once. Eventually these interests seem to 'muddy the waters' of a particular bugzilla by arbitrarily usurping some reports as duplicates without proper rationale, diffuse the focus of report by peppering the "see also" list with tangent issues made in other reports or build little self-serving cabals by making other reports blocking/dependent on what should be stand-alone issues or concerns. That said, if the above linked merge resolves the reported issue(s) then I'm of the opinion that this bug should be closed and any further changes should be taken up in the appropriate bugzillas (if they exist) or open a new one addressing whatever needs resolving/discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
