https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29908

--- Comment #13 from George Orwell III <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Bartosz DziewoƄski from comment #11)
> The patch has been reverted, back to drawing board.
> 
> We need a way to let extensions decide whether the toolbar should be
> displayed on pages they manage. . . .

Why can't we instead make a User preference option (disabled by default) under
the 'Appearance' tab, 'Skin' section that toggles the generation of a toolbar
in the those .js/.css situations regardless of having the 'sysop' bit (for
MediaWiki: namespace .js/.css) or just being a plain-old registered User (for
User: namespace .js/.css)?

This way, the option for which buttons can appear in what namespace under
whatever toolbar [or not] is remains open for the "experienced" User(s) to
manipulate as needed while still being mindful of the "newbies" and the trouble
they can get into by fudging-up their .css or .js files accidently. At the same
time, the combination of possible editing preferences in place on the 'Editing'
tab, 'Editor' section (e.g. 'Classic' [this Bug] vs. WikiEditor [Bug 24041])
play no role either way in resolving the specific issue at hand to boot.

I've never believed in "push" solutions that minimizes User choice; it
frequently minimizes User responsibility in the process as well. Take the
toolbar away for X reason(s) and you're the 'bad guy' for infringing upon a
contributor's "perceived rights". Let the contributor hang themselves by
enabling something they didn't know how to use in the first place and there is
no 'bad-guy' to blame but themselves.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to