https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70349
--- Comment #8 from Isarra <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jon from comment #6) > FYI The Trello code as stated is only for _prioritisation_ and _scheduling_. > All discussion happens on Bugzilla. I'd complain about discussing prioritisation, but now it occurs to me that phabricator should be resolving all of this soon enough anyway, so nevermind. Sorry for bringing that up. (In reply to Dan Garry from comment #7) > I'm not sure this is as much of a problem as it seems. I took at the last 15 > edits made from the app that used canned edit summaries, and only two of > them misused them. 2 out of 15 is pretty bad. > Anyway, I'm sorry if you're having to slightly adjust your anti-vandalism > patterns, but we're not considering tagging the edits at this time. The > standard format of the canned edit summary is easy enough to spot if you > want to look out for them, and you can always use the "mobile app edit" tag > to give special scrutiny to app edits if you must. The standard format of the canned edit summaries currently matches a common vandal tactic (that of using misleading simple edit summaries when doing something else entirely), but changing them to use a prefix (which basically just means changing the strings and doesn't require any real technical changes, unlike tagging) would address that. Please don't needlessly impair the workflow of the users who keep the sites worth visiting, especially when it has a relatively trivial fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
