https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70573

James Forrester <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|Unprioritized               |Normal
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[email protected],
                   |                            |[email protected]
          Component|General                     |Editing Tools
            Summary|VisualEditor: After you     |VisualEditor: After you
                   |create or edit a reference  |insert a new node, don't
                   |and close the ref dialog,   |select it but drop the
                   |please de-select the newly  |cursor immediately after it
                   |created citation            |instead

--- Comment #3 from James Forrester <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Mike Christie from comment #2)
> I wouldn't want to make a blanket statement, and I can recall situations
> where the fact that an object remains selected was useful -- going straight
> back into a cite to fix an error I just realized I made, for example.  For
> some things, such as links, I think it's definitely better to deselect --
> it's absolutely normal for a user to want to continue typing.  For
> templates, I can see an argument for keeping the selection.  Citations seem
> to me more like links than templates in this way.
> 
> I think the design question is: what would a user who is expert in VE want
> the system to do to maximize productivity?  I think the answer is going to
> be to leave it unselected more often than not.

That's a reasonable way of looking at it; I think I agree. There are some
possible issues with block images (where, especially if you have a long infobox
on a short screen, the content may have been inserted off-screen), but maybe we
should optimise for the most common case? Will ask others on the team to weigh
in, but broadly this seems sensible. Thanks!


> One other thought: just as there's a "Save" and also a "Save and new" pair
> of buttons in some interfaces, there might be a "Save and add another
> citation" button on the interface, or something along those lines.  But
> perhaps that's a separate enhancement suggestion.

(Yes, this should be a new bug, but…)

Hmm. I think that "Save and also add a new one" is really rare for inserting
content, and really confusing. Wouldn't it be better to have
easily-rememberable keyboard shortcuts instead?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to