https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70599

--- Comment #8 from Alvaro <a...@bitergia.com> ---
(In reply to Alvaro from comment #7)
> (In reply to Quim Gil from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Alvaro from comment #4)
> > > Let me check ... TorBlock data:
> > > 
> > > http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/data/json/gerrit.wikimedia.
> > > org_mediawiki_extensions_TorBlock-scr-rep-static.json
> > > 
> > > has the "review_time_pending_upload_days_median": 495.29124999999999" used
> > > for ordering. And it is the higher one.
> > 
> > This is not what Gerrit says:
> > 
> > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions/
> > TorBlock,n,z
> > 
> > Only one patch waiting for review, with a las version uploaded on 21 August
> > 2014 (only 20 days ago)
> > 
> > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/62026/
> 
> Yes, we have fixed a problem in time series for upload (aggregated
> information used for ordering was right). We are rechecking the logic to
> detect that a review is waiting for Submitter. 
> 
> Right now rechecking the data about TorBlock.

Yes, in the SQL we were not using the min upload time. It is fixed and
regenerating the metrics now. It is hard to include all the logic in SQL that
we are reaching. I hope that with this fix the resulting metric is right. Once
the new metrics are available I will recheck them with several repositories to
be sure about them.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to