https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23796
--- Comment #8 from Happy-melon <[email protected]> 2010-06-21 14:37:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I'd rather see this implemented either as full image syntax, or as full > > wikitext. Supporting only 16px icons with no click-through doesn't actually > > solve the original problem, which was how to position the FlaggedRevs > > widget, > > as well as being useless for most of the things wikis use the icons for. > > I thought about that. I just didn't get to it. Opening up more of the image > syntax (including linking) is a good idea IMO. However, I'm a bit leery of > opening up all wikitext. This pfunc is designed for putting little clickable > things in the upper right corner of articles, and I'm afraid what opening up > the syntax might encourage. I agree it needs caution. I think the main step is storing processed HTML in the ParserOutput array; that way extensions can add whatever they like to it (plus it's a bit wierd that what comes out of the 'parser' is not actually *parsed* :D). What we allow people to add directly from wikitext is a separate question. > > On the other hand, I *do* like the backend implementation via ParserOutput. > > At least I did something right :) :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
