https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
--- Comment #2 from Vogone <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) from comment #1) > I don't like the idea of putting a permanent log entry on every single wiki, > there are plenty of other actions that would affect the wiki but are only > logged on meta (or commons). Is there any reason for it? And anyway, logging one half of the action on meta (the rename itself) and the other half of the action locally (resulting page moves) seems somewhat inconsistent to me. MassMessage for example also leaves an entry in the page histories (like a normal local edit), so why would it be bad if an actual local rename was also logged as such in the appropriate local log? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
