https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70154
James Forrester <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from James Forrester <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Quim Gil from comment #3) > What about something in between: > > In the first paragraph, add a link to [[mw:Beta_Features]] (all the better > if we can use Special:MyLanguage or a way to link to the translation > currently used by the user: > > "Here are some <link>new features</link> we're considering for MediaWiki." > > It is reasonable to think that a percentage of users landing in this > Preferences page will be interested in knowing more about Beta Features > altogether. In [[mw:Beta_Features]] there is a section "Creating Your Own" > for the percentage of the percentage that might think of proposing a beta > feature one day. Sure, but most wikis will immediately turn that link into a local discussion of software change, which though valuable will almost never contain the language pushing for people to go to WMF's MediaWiki.org site for this. I concur with Seb35. The ratio of burden to impact is too far out of alignment. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
