https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69603
--- Comment #16 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcin Cieślak from comment #14) > Having reviewed the bugs (see the attachment) I would propose to rename the > component to "PDF generation" or maybe "PDF and offline formats generation" > to make sure people searching for "PDF" find it there first. Usually Collection is presented to the public as the [[m:Book tool]], is that clear enough? Remember we also have the openZIM product. > Since we have some bugs already that are reproducible in both mwlib and the > ocg renderer I would suggest to use tracking bugs to mark bugs as confirmed > against some particular renderer. We have already a tracking bug for ZIM, Agreed, please do. As an alternative, a tag in whiteboard could be used. Either way, can you please apply on bugzilla the classification you made in your spreadsheet? I already saw some bugs I'd like to reclassify, but it's clunky to edit outside bugzilla. > I > also wonder if we should not have a separate bug for rendering of RTL and > some other complex scripts (it's a whole class of problems there on its own). We should reuse bug 745 and similar generic trackers, see e.g. link in comment 12. (In reply to C. Scott Ananian from comment #13) > We're about to migrate to Phabricator. I think it's not worth fixing issues > with how bugzilla manages search. IMHO the opposite: we need a functioning bugzilla in the coming two weeks for https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Triage/201410 , so there's no best moment to fix this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
