https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
Douglas Gardner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED CC| |[email protected] Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #4 from Douglas Gardner <[email protected]> --- Do we still want the block button to be destructive? This bug was originally about it not having any style at all -- it now has a constructive style. According to the style guide, destructive should be used for "actions which result in the destruction of data". However, no data is destroyed when a user is blocked: it is merely a "final action in the process that results in a change of state", which is what constructive is used for. Another thing to think about: if the "block" button should be destructive, what about the "amend" button? Is it still destructive, even if we're shortening a block? Is it still constructive, even if we're lengthening it? For reference, the style guide is located at https://tools.wmflabs.org/styleguide/desktop/section-2.html. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
