https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71950
--- Comment #2 from Tisza Gergő <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Maarten Dammers from comment #0) > Both Artwork and Book require either description or title to be set. Now > artworks and books that only have the title set (and not description) > incorrectly end up in > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_with_no_machine- > readable_description I would argue that's correct, at least in theory. A title and a description are different things (and will have different fields in the structured data); having a title is no reason not to add a description as well. For one thing, key concepts should be wikilinked in the description, which practically never happens in the artwork/book titles. Also, the titles are messy - e.g. half the HABS ([[c:Category:Files_from_the_Historic_American_Buildings_Survey]]) images have a "title" which is the concatenation of the actual title and the description; for other files it is a concatenation of the actual title and the source. So there is no reason to exclude these files from a description cleanup drive, IMO. For the same reasons, I don't think it makes sense for the template to pretend its title field to be a description. In practice, we might want to say such images are less problematic than ones with neither title nor description and the category should be limited to those, at least initially; I'll defer to you and Guillaume on that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
