Jdforrester-WMF added a comment.
>>! In T857#14529, @Qgil wrote:
>>>! In T857#14509, @Chad wrote:
>> I think if we'd had BZ ready to import for day 1 instead of waiting and
>> importing labs content first was the problem. Otherwise we could've just
>> started with {T1} at import.
>
> As far as I know, this is not related about T1 not being available today, but
> about the script migrating Bugzilla reports one by one or in batches. I guess
> @chasemp could fine tune his script to import task 1 completely, then 2, then
> 3... And I guess we could assign them task numbers *1, *2, *3... here.
> However, this would lead to a much slower migration. People are already
> uncomfortable with our 1-3 days time frame. Would they willing to add 1-2
> days just to keep the numbers?
In general, the downtime is bad. But for this? Yes, I think so.
>>>! In T857#14511, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:
>> For a few years. We're talking here about links that need to work in a
>> decade.
>
> What is the problem of keeping redirects during a decade or more? It's a
> static piece of information that doesn't bother the servers.
It's yet another thing to break. ;-)
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T857
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign
<username>.
To: Jdforrester-WMF
Cc: Jdforrester-WMF, chasemp, Qgil, Chad, Aklapper, Nemo_bis, wikibugs-l
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
