https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72459
--- Comment #12 from Jan Zerebecki <[email protected]> --- (In reply to John F. Lewis from comment #10) > The ideal of 'you > need to have the community's trust or sign a legally binding agreement with > us' seems a rather weird way to manage stuff. That is not at all how it is nor what I want it to to be. One for sure needs to be trusted to get access to non-public data. Even more so for system level access instead of on wiki. That trust is just assessed in a different process instead of an RfA. The NDA is an additional requirement, not a sufficient one. (In reply to Vogone from comment #11) > Besides, as you can see in the comments of the RFC's, a significant part of > the community voiced their opinion against this group being opened for > non-staff (as opposed to what originally has been proposed). So "which would > imply that people who can not be contractually ordered to do something are > excluded" is true unless another community decision shows otherwise. You are right. I should have read the actual summary instead of only the request. And I agree with the concerns that it should be more restricted than just any developer. I was more thinking of people who already have system level access on production e.g. for doing deployments, debugging, etc. . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
