https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72525
Dereckson <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW --- Comment #6 from Dereckson <[email protected]> --- In this consultation, I note: - the lack of strong support of Tpt, current current maintainer of Proofreadpage - the very weak support of the proposal (but yes, it's a current recurring issue these last years) - the need to take in account the charge in the databases I consulted reedy on #mediawiki on the matter (who then created the patch noted in comment #3). Reedy considers "they're gonna be indexed updates, so it's a case of doing it as batched queries, waiting for slaves" and to not "see any obvious reason straight off why it shouldn't be doable". As a next course of action, they suggests to count the number of affected pages, and to "come up with a rough plan of action". Tpt knows of course well the issue to have play with this idea sometimes these previous years, so they is a good candidate for that. [Taking back as NEW, the patch were only the first step to make the situation more clear in the configuration] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
