https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72931
--- Comment #2 from Sam Reed (reedy) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marc A. Pelletier from comment #1) > Sounds sane; the actual cost of adding a timestamp should be essentially > nil, and I can think of a couple use cases when patrolling for spam links > that make it easier than trawling the RC. > > That said, the column would be nearly useless without an index and I know > there's a cost for /that/, so someone more versed in performance will need > to chime in. I think it should be alright. Any indexing has some cost, and we regularly index many tables/columns with timestamps. The cost of doing should be fine as there's a reasonable use case, rather than a generic "this might be useful" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
