https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500

Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Do not output empty         |Do not output variant
                   |portlets                    |portlet for languages
                   |                            |without variants

--- Comment #5 from Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> 2010-07-23 06:11:10 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Please read carefuly. It is not only about empty <ul>.
> 
> The entire empty portlet should not be there at all.
> 
> Why should e.g. be there "Variant" portlet in languages, which do not use
> variants? Etc.
> 
This specific argument make sense: the variant portlet should be safe to drop
for languages without variants. Repurposing bug.

> Reopening, since this is not about the validity only. (Besides, untill we will
> serve HTML5 (and that might take long time, it won't be in few months), it
> still IS invalid.)
As outlined on one of the previous bug, we care more about not breaking scripts
than we care about such a harmless invalidity: the rule that <ul>s can't be
empty is a stupid one that all browsers I know of ignore (which makes perfect
sense) ands which was dropped in HTML5, probably for these reasons (most of the
premise of the simplified HTML5 markup is that it exploits tolerances in
existing browsers' HTML parsers, AFAIK)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to