https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72907
--- Comment #7 from Dereckson <[email protected]> --- To hijack the bug process for policies making and use a life cycle designed for technical issues will of course create this divergence of reading. Please also refrain to give opinions as objective FACT. You consider NEW is the correct status. NEW isn't the objective correct status. A sound argument for UNCO is "it hasn't been verified a Wikimedia bug, as we don't have any consensus to perform such a move'. But this discussion isn't about NEW or UNCO status. It's about moving Git repositories. Experience told us a bug tracker is a poor shop to discuss policies. Please open a RFC on mediawiki.org or discuss the issue on the relevant mailing lists. A community consensus is required to revert a current consensus. Comment 1 says "Also, we already had this discussion, and esentially decided to have components that depend on MediaWiki be on Gerrit and those that don't on GitHub". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
