https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #57 from Michael Zajac <[email protected]> 2010-07-28 23:56:58 CDT --- (In reply to comment #56) > Aryeh, in Comment #52: > >> Definitely proper in HTML5 > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/address.html > > > > Nope, definitely improper, see above. It represents contact info for the > > <body> or <article> it's in, not arbitrary contact info. > > You quoted too selectively. The rest of it is: "If an address element applies > to a section of a document, then it represents contact information for that > section only." I.e., the element (and I agree it's an odd one) represents > attribution, not arbitrary contact information, but it's scope is actually > undefined (it *defaults* to the whole document, but can be just a "section", > and the interpretation of that term is left open). I think the spec must have changed since that document was updated. In the latest version, it can only apply to an article or body element: > The address element represents the contact information for its nearest > article or body element ancestor. And the rules for determining the scope are specific. See http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-address-element -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
