--- Comment #9 from James Forrester <> ---
(In reply to MZMcBride from comment #8)
> (In reply to James Forrester from comment #7)
> > Semi-+1 from a Product perspective; I'd recommend that LCA get flagged (at
> > the very least) first before considering it a +2.
> LCA presumably refers to [[wmf:LCA]]. Can you expand on why involvement from
> the LCA group is recommended here? Are you worried about editing disclaimer
> text? I'm having difficulty imagining user pages or global (wikifarm-wide)
> bits and pieces being a legal issue (we've had both for a very long
> time...), but then again, I'm not a lawyer!

It's the C, not the L, part of LCA that will mostly care, as it trivially
impacts community audit requirements.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to