https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24415
Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rkald...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> 2010-09-28 20:03:15
UTC ---
Isn't this bug set up backwards? A tracking bug normally includes issues that
need to be fixed in order to meet a certain milestone or release a certain
feature. The bugs that will be fixed by that feature are then listed under
"Blocks". Due to how this bug is defined, all the bugs that are blocked by
Resource Loader are listed as "Depends on" and those bugs don't have a proper
Resource Loader bug to list as a Blocker.
Why don't we just have a bug called "Implement Resource Loader"? All the bugs
that would be fixed by it can then be listed as "Blocks" and all the bugs that
have to be fixed as part of the Resource Loader implementation would be listed
as "Depends on". We don't need to reinvent this functionality by creating a
"blocks tracker" (which inverts the normal dependency logic). It's too
confusing, IMO.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
