https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25729
--- Comment #8 from Platonides <[email protected]> 2010-11-02 17:19:39 UTC --- > It may be possible to use MediaWiki:<skin>.css, but as a non-admin, it is a > bit > more difficult to make changes. I am aware of such inconvenience, but despite of it, still seems a better system. > not it's in a #ifeq: or not. If it's not > detected by anti-vandalism tools, it may be a bit harder to remove, but it > shouldn't be too difficult for someone who searches up "<profanity here>" to > remove it. Until you get that profanity included in a template included only for a few uncommon skins from a template three levels deep. Which makes me thing, including links or templates under a {{CURRENTSKIN}} branch would produce another instance into bug 14404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
