https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28439
--- Comment #4 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> 2011-04-18 21:50:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't think either of these two statements is correct, but you may > know something I don't: > > “actively supported” — Is someone besides Andrew maintaining it? > If so, I'd like to know. Andrew has been pretty clear that he > doesn't think it is worth his time to support LQT in its current > form. > > “maintained” — Again, is this someone besides Andrew? Because he is > not maintaining LQT in its current form. Well, LiquidThreads has been around for several years and is deployed to a number of sites, including Wikimedia wikis. If support for LQTv1 is being completely dropped, it'd be nice if that were made explicit somewhere. I haven't seen anything to suggest that it is (and doing so obviously has consequences both for Wikimedia wikis and non-Wikimedia wikis). In this case, someone has filed a bug about fatal errors popping up when they install an extension using a fairly recent version of MediaWiki. I doubt this user cares about a LiquidThreads rewrite, but I imagine they do care about having a properly working site. They've taken the time to file a bug report; it'd be nice if it weren't simply discarded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
