https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24754
Nemo_bis <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Nemo_bis <[email protected]> 2011-04-25 19:14:14 UTC --- Perhaps this should be discussed before: you're actually proposing a new method to count articles which is more restrictive (or anyway different) than the current one. Articles which include a file or a category should arguably counted as "good"; perhaps articles which just include some template shouldn't. And bug 26033 proposes yet another method. (In reply to comment #0) > It has been discussed on random places several times that this method is even > more useless and less reliable then check for presence of links (because it's > possible to write quite long article without any comma at all as well as e.g. > article "Pi" saying only "3,14", not even speaking about languages which do > not > use comma) and thus it should be removed completely (yay! another worthless > and > useless config variable away!). It's still there just for backward compatibility, what's the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
