https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29197
--- Comment #14 from Happy-melon <[email protected]> 2011-05-31 22:50:30 UTC --- Indeed; but you seem to have found an optimisation which produces the same functionality for ony a 5% memory footprint penalty, as opposed to the 1125% penalty in the original version. Is that good enough performance to put it back in? Does this mean it's possible to crash *any* server with a long enough URL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
