https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29276
Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] | |om --- Comment #2 from Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> 2011-06-05 18:07:23 UTC --- It amuses me a bit that I somehow ended up being the one quoted here, since I'm not exactly a great parser expert. I still think a postprocessor is the way to go here. There'd be no other way to cache pages with nonzero stub threshold unless we want to add a lot more cache invalidation logic or accept outdated link coloring. And a postprocessor would let us get rid of cache fragmentation for some other preferences, and avoid having to purge caches in some cases (like page creation/deletion), and maybe other good stuff too. Maybe there's a fatal flaw I'm missing, though, beyond "nobody's stepping up to do it". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
