https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29544
--- Comment #2 from Brion Vibber <[email protected]> 2011-06-23 18:27:30 UTC --- You're definitely right that the current rendering looks way too dark and the antialiasing looks pretty bad... but the 2.2 gamma seems much too light to me for on-screen reading, probably because many thin strokes are much thinner than one pixel at this size. I suspect the darker gamma got picked because darkening the antialiased thin strokes effectively makes them appear "wider", making the text overall more legible. Are there alternate font rendering settings or even alternate fonts that might be better for screen-oriented rendering? (Of course moving forward we may also want to be thinking about better in-client rendering to aid legibility on high-resolution displays and printing directly from the wiki. There are various MathML/SVG/scary HTML roads that can be taken there, all of which will be more work than tweaking the latex settings. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
