https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18231
Church of emacs <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] | |m --- Comment #14 from Church of emacs <[email protected]> 2011-06-26 15:32:06 UTC --- One problem I see with that, is that facts are often backed up with more than one source. You end up with a complicated structure rather than a tree of references. Take this for an example: Statement with A as source. Statement with both A and B as source. Statement with B as source. There are two possible ways to interpret the following syntax: <ref source="somewhere">Statement with A as source. <ref source="somwhere else">Statement with both A and B as source.</ref> Statement with B as source.</ref> The </ref> part has to include a name tag as well, or else you won't be able to distinguish which references you are closing. That being said, there is a nice GUI: highlight the referenced text when the user hovers over its reference number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
