https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30417

Reedy <s...@reedyboy.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |shell

--- Comment #6 from Reedy <s...@reedyboy.net> 2011-08-17 13:14:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Do we actually have consensus? The lack of votes seems a bit strange
> The opening post in that section argued (and I tend to agree) that both
> extensions only improve functions already present in huwiki (the ability to
> give barnstarns, and the article rating feature from flaggedrevs) and 
> therefore
> should not be controversial – hence, a vote was deemed unnecessary unless
> people came forward to express their opposition, which they did not. 
> 
> I am sure, we could arrange to discuss it till eternity and hold a formal 
> vote,
> but that would seem a bit of an overreaction in the current case. (The 
> proposal
> was posted in one of the most frequented community pages with plenty of 
> traffic
> on the days since, if people did not agree with the proposal, they would have
> expressed themselves).
> 
> > It still also says pending
> The template is there to make sure the archiver bot does not archive the given
> section, and it is pending in the sense that the raison d'être of the section
> ("enable the features") has not been accomplished.

No, that's fine if that's the way your wiki does things. As you'll probably
know, we usually experience the usual enwiki votes and arguments.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to