https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30270

--- Comment #14 from [email protected] 2011-08-24 06:13:34 UTC ---
Thanks for the photos!

I agree about the whitespace: We're making a "gallery", which implies some
effort at aesthetics.

There's not quite enough space between the images on my edits, and they would
look a bit nicer with more space. I'm not opposed to leaving them narrow
though, just to get this done. It doesn't look terrible that way, and it has a
practical advantage of providing more images per row, with less wrapping (which
is very ugly). Plus, it's expedient. 

Hmm, when I think about how ugly it is to have 1 image wrapped and hanging out
of place, the narrow spacing stops seeming unattractive. I don't think they
should be spaced out more unless the spacing can be dynamic, to minimize
wrapping. That's much uglier than the beauty of whitespace, for a net loss.

About caption wrapping: Don't forget how small this space is to begin with. 4px
may not sound like much (on each side, iirc?), but it's a significant
percentage of the available space. And, being one pixel too short for a single
letter will not affect just one letter - it will cause a whole word to wrap, OR
MORE, if it's a hyphenated word like a name or something. 

Just imagine having a wiki page of university faculty, each with long names
like "Chandrasekhar". Or maybe concatenated names for images of scientific
subjects like "An Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox". It would be much nicer if
those captions didn't need to wrap until absolutely necessary. Otherwise, you
end up with very little on some lines, and lot on others, which makes it look
odd.

Imagine the last example looking something like this:

An
Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen 
paradox

Or this:

An
Einstein–Podolsky–
Rosen 
paradox

It starts to get difficult to read at that point, and causes the entire gallery
bottom borders to descend just to accommodate perhaps only one image that word
wraps unnecessarily. Keep in mind that some languages can have very long words,
like Finnish and German. Others have short words, but sometimes more of them,
like Spanish or Chinese (where word wrapping would be less of a problem).

In addition to language, it also depends on font size. In something as small
and delicate as the MediaWiki gallery, we can't really afford to be wasteful.
The beauty comes mostly from the content images anyway, so I think we ought to
lean towards letting that dominate, without intruding too much with our own
aesthetics.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to