https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25763
--- Comment #12 from [email protected] 2011-09-04 17:05:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > It should not be necessary to hide the user entirely in order to ensure that a > hidden log entry does not appear. I do not think so. What helps you, when the block is not shown in that list, but the username is visible at many other places? Log is for documentation only. If you hide the username, all logs would also hidden. When you hide the log entry for a user right change, the user rights are still visible by the user. When you hide the log entry for a move, the move is still visible in the history with the null revision. Technical it is hard to do this. A ipb_deleted = 1 indicates a hide username. You have to use another number and test many places. For example: per API you can get the blockinfo for the user (but not the log entry, because only the log entry is hidden, not the block itself): http://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allusers|users|blocks&aufrom=Yourmomsuckscock&aulimit=1&auprop=blockinfo&ususers=Yourmomsuckscock&usprop=blockinfo&bkusers=Yourmomsuckscock In my opinion, it is wrong from the UI, that is does not show the information, that the user is blocked, when the log entry is deleted/suppressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
