https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30846

--- Comment #8 from Soslan Khubulov <[email protected]> 2011-09-10 14:40:11 UTC 
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Why is there convertPlural that re-implements the default implementation?

I didn't know that there is the default rule.

But I still think we should implement convertPlural for Ossetic. It is clear
using form0 for n=1 and form1 for n>1 in literature dialect. But using form1
for n=0 is not clear in literature. So it would be better for finding best form
for Ossetic if someone see unclear rule in class LanguageOs instead of
searching it in class Language. But if it is necessary I won't mind deleting
convertPlural function.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to