https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30885
MZMcBride <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> 2011-09-13 23:19:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > ArticleFeedback is an experimental feature created by the Wikimedia Foundation > as part of the [[mw: New Editor Engagement]] program. It's still up to undergo > some more changes, based on the feedback and the results of it. The code should be adaptable to other MediaWiki installations, just like nearly any other MediaWiki extension. > It is not a priority to make a previous version of a concept that is still > under development compatible with 1.17. Once AFT is ready (ie. 1.0), we could > decide to backport it to whatever is the latest release version at that moment > if it does not work with that version already. But requesting 1.17 > compatibility at this time sounds like a bad idea. I don't see how priorities are relevant here. It may not be a priority to Wikimedia or to you, but that doesn't make the bug invalid. There are branches for a reason. Having a branched version of the extension that works with _the current version of MediaWiki_ doesn't seem like an unreasonable request. > Marking WONTFIX. Re-opening, per the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
