https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30868
--- Comment #2 from Bawolff <[email protected]> 2011-09-17 21:02:30 UTC --- The raw thing is an interesting hack... I don't necessarily think this is invalid imho (since you can't detect an error condition using the #iferror parser func, like you arguably should. Also I more consider invalid bugs to be things that are nonsensical as opposed to things we just don't want to do.) However, it is something that I would consider low-ish priority unless it can be demonstrated it is needed (like for example if duplicatebug's solution is insufficient. I would consider needing to use raw: in such a different way than its desired functionality to be a demonstration its needed) . Before changing this though, one would want to check to see if people are relying on the current behaviour. However, this is super easy to do... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
