https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29994
Neil Kandalgaonkar <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|High |Normal Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #5 from Neil Kandalgaonkar <[email protected]> 2011-09-22 01:39:38 UTC --- Okay, just to touch this bug again; when I promised a fix, I thought we were talking about the bug which was resolved in bug 30237, whereby multiple licenses were added without user action, like the template loop bugs. But this bug is more like a request for a change in policy, to not allow multilicensing, on the theory that people out there just can't do it right. I am aware that some license combinations make no sense. In fact, when I was developing this, I even tried to add features that would stop people from combining incompatible licenses. But this is pretty hard and I was told to give up. They may be *logically* incompatible to any sane human, but that doesn't mean they are *legally* incompatible. But, back to your originally complaint. I think we should be open to changing it to not allow multilicensing, but I think you need to build some consensus on Commons first. The discussion you pointed to is now archived here at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2011/07#UploadWizard_gone_mad.3F I see no consensus there on changing the wizard to not allow third party multilicensing -- people are discussing a number of issues. I encourage you to bring it up again on the Village Pump. Downgrading to enhancement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
