https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31374
--- Comment #21 from Tim Starling <[email protected]> 2011-10-06 04:27:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > Putting the {{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}}} madness issues aside, the use-case isn't > {{#tag:ref|{{#tag:ref}}}}, it's {{#tag:ref|<ref></ref>}} (see comment 0). > Accommodating (and encouraging) syntax like this is exactly what got the > parser > into the shape it's in now. Haphazard hacks get ingrained into the code and > then suddenly everyone else is expected to be able to deal with them, rather > than implementing a proper solution when the issues are obvious. That was > largely my point, but it seems to be rather moot now. Nested tags have always been allowed, I fixed a related bug as early as r2880. A bug with nested tags does not indicate that there is a problem with #tag, since there are plenty of other ways to do nested tags. If you have some deeper problem with #tag, I suggest you complain on another bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
