https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31063

--- Comment #11 from Gregor Hagedorn <[email protected]> 2011-10-26 
08:36:23 UTC ---
That was a hornet nest, ok... I am almost convinced by the circular loading
argument. Except I have a preference for wikis, that is: put things into a
transparent, editable object repository and harvest from there. Like Categories
and everything else. There is nothing wrong with having a namespace table, it
could easily be harvested off MediaWiki: - except that would mean hardcoding
the symbolic name for Mediawiki NS. Advantage: changes are tracked, editability
is free (ultimately extensions should probably register their namespace, but
for a long time this would require user interaction).

I wish the same were true for the interwiki table: store as a transparent,
changeable, version traceable object rather than as database table without
version control and user interface. The present interwiki table, would be a bad
example of how to manage namespaces. It is not included in import/export. It
remains uneditable for how many years? 1000s of people trying to use mediawiki
have to figure out which of
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Interwiki_extensions they need to
install. How many give up? I am adding bug 31951 to call for moving
Extension:Interwiki to core, and bug 31955 to address the import/export
question for interwiki.

I am not a developer, only a mediawiki farm manager and applied user, so I
fully accept your insight into the code structure which I don't have!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to