https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24915
Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> 2011-10-26 13:57:54 UTC --- Initial notes: - body.page-* is not unnecessarily specific, it's good practice to restrict signatures to the element signatures are placed on. - Admittedly charsets are not relevant, MediaWiki sanitizes any non-alphanumeric+-_ character in css classes. Specific to this idea of fixed-width centering vector: - Here's a base for fixed-width centering vector https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Dantman/vector-fixed.css - Have you actually bothered to test out the technique you're describing on vector? The css you specified doesn't work it needs more to actually make vector fixed-width. And when you actually manage to make vector fixed-width you realize that it's messed up: The backgrounds need to expand to the full width of the page, but can't because of the hack added, the lack of a right border on #content looks messed up, but you can't add one the same way vector adds the left one without a second content area inside the content area or using css3 multiple backgrounds that only work in some modern browsers. - What you really want sounds like an enhancement to vector to provide wrapper elements with a class that can be used to make the actual content+ui of vector fixed-width. I don't see a good enough reason to force users to migrate css breaking compatibility or maintain duplicate signatures. Please file the vector enhancements as a separate bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
