Liuxinyu970226 added a comment.

Because of the email copy above, I would say that the Apple did such things wrong, the Google did wrong, the Microsoft did wrong, the Mozilla did wrong, the Nintendo did wrong, the Samsung did wrong, the Sony did wrong, and most of Wikipedia contributors did wrong too... (don't surprise, the Tesla did wrong too in this grey area) that using mn-mong is not well-considered.

Should I change the title and description to not directly mention mn-mong, but a list that includes this as just a candidate? Anyway, I suggest to mark this task as stalled, since there's really really and really trustees problems from SIL, from the Library of Congress, the ISO, the IEC, the IEEE, the IETF, the ITU, and the ICANN.



To: Liuxinyu970226
Cc: Badaa, ChristianKl, C933103, jhsoby, thiemowmde, Liuxinyu970226, Lydia_Pintscher, GerardM, Aklapper, Zppix, Popolon, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Wikidata-bugs mailing list

Reply via email to