WMDE-leszek added a comment. |
I just had a chat with @Ladsgroup and he suggested regarding wbl_lemmas table the following: what about not putting this stuff in the database table but storing all lemmas for display in the cache (or cache them when they're used). I am bit ignorant, but as wbl_lemmas is made for display only (which is my understanding), this seems like a plausible thought. Of course as long as the amount of data is something which is fine for caching.
I am not aware of all constraints, so any thoughts on this @thiemowmde and @daniel?
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: thiemowmde, WMDE-leszek
Cc: daniel, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Ladsgroup, WMDE-leszek, thiemowmde, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Lahi, Gq86, Cinemantique, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331
Cc: daniel, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Ladsgroup, WMDE-leszek, thiemowmde, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Lahi, Gq86, Cinemantique, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs